Young nude girls

Tuesday, 8 February 2005

This is a sort of mental spam trap. There are no nude girls here. Well, there are a couple here but none on this site. Well, if pressed, yowser!, one must admit there are pieces of a few here and here. If you don’t know how to use Google’s image search to find porn, you deserve this kind of sidetracking.

No underage nudes, only information about your general hunger for them. So if you’re here to find skin, you’ll only find your own, flapping on the fence post. Pow, whatcha gonna do now?

The graphs and data below come from searches referring visitors to Sedition·com in the past 18 months. If you’re curious to see some searches that bring people here as they happen, here is the referring searches page; enjoy the fruitless debauchery.

young nude girls

That’s right, you’re looking for naked girls about 13 years of age. Boy, that’s charming. I had a hunch it would bell-out there and I was right. Here are some more lies, I mean statistics. To think I got my first $15,000 raise for doing this same sort of stuff at where my audience was also not listening.

                   mean -->> 14.07
                 median -->> 13.00
     standard_deviation -->>  5.49

There were tiny statistical spikes at 40 and 65 but they didn’t even reach the size of age groups like 4 and 5, and they’re not revolting, so they’re left out of the graphs.

young nude girls by country

The more you know: child pornography

As a public service, I’d like to remind the viewers at home that:

  1. Underage porn, even the softest-core, and they are oh, so soft at that age, will land you in the big house (not to be confused with the monkey house, aka 1600 Pennsylvania Ave).
  2. Many browsers keep a history of where you go, what you search for, and even what you type. And other persons’ webservers, like mine, record the same information by your IP which is usually traceable back to you.
  3. If none of the above has sunk in, I’ll spell it out. If you actually manage to find underage nude girls online, which you probably won’t, prison is just one dime-drop away for as long as the statute of limitations in your state lasts, i.e. years.

The numbers

Selected levels of national perversion in ascending magnitude of collective deviance.

6 Hong Kong
6 Sweden
6 Russian Federation
6 Romania
7 United Arab Emirates
7 Pakistan
7 Brazil
8 Croatia
11 Netherlands
11 New Zealand
12 European Union
18 Belgium
32 South Africa
70 Israel
87 Australia
116 Canada
129 India
204 United Kingdom
248 Germany
484 indeterminate
1,450 United States

As usual, America retains its clear dominance in a field that is pathetic, perverted, and sad.

Update, 21 June 2007

There is a less ironic explication of sorts here–Viewer mail: underage pornography.

81 comments · Commenting is closed
digg stumbleupon reddit Fark Technorati Faves




Re: Young nude girls

hi i agree i heard that there are p2p cilents like ares that have child pornography and lots of it and torture rape and more i hope it is shut dwn its horrible and theres nudism sites like that features illegal pics and videos

By cory on 10 June 2007 · 18:55


Re^2: Young nude girls is not illegal. Here is their legal:
Nudist Material material that we sell are legal in every city, every state and every county inside the United States. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958, when the Supreme Court vacated a Court of Appeals finding that Sunshine & Health magazine could be obscene (Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, Postmaster General, 355 U.S. 372). The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression. Our memberships are widely sold in all of Asia, Europe, South America, Canada, Australia and Africa. The only exception may be countries where nudity of any kind is banned, i.e. Iraq, Syria, and Iran.

U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 Compliance Notice

Most or all visual depictions displayed on this Website are exempt from the provision of 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75 because said visual depictions do not consist of depictions of conduct as specifically listed in 18 U.S.C section 2256 (2) (A) through (D), but are merely depictions of non-sexually explicit nudity, or are depictions of simulated sexual conduct, or are otherwise exempt because the visual depictions were created prior to July 3, 1995.

Should there be any visual depictions displayed on this Website of actual sexually explicit conduct, such models, actors, actresses and other persons appearing or otherwise contained in this Website were over the age of eighteen years at the time of the creation of such depictions.

All visual depictions displayed on this Website involving nudity and/or partial nudity have been thoroughly vetted by the webmaster to only include visual depictions of subjects appearing to be clearly above the age of 18, though this is not a requirement according to the Section 2257 Compliance herein referred to.

At present, no material on the website requires record-keeping, however should that status change, any enquiries about specific material contained herein and the corresponding Custodian of Records information pertaining to those items, should be directed to


If you have any further enquiries or concerns about our legal policy please email us at

By bobsaget25 on 23 December 2008 · 11:20


Re^3: Young nude girls

PureNudism claims to be a "100% naturist online learning site with never any adult or sexual material"). Its members photography homepage ( claims that members "will enjoy a unique opportunity to observe naturist lifestyle as it happens: Real, Uncut and Uncensored." However, I have noticed that most of their most recent gallery pictures have what appears to be some "censorship" in the form of a circular or rectangular "blurring mask" applied to the exposed "little holes for making poo-poo" of some kids (even though they are not doing anything sexually explicit - they are just playing in the sand, building sand castles, and standing in four legs while playing is typical during early childhood). Isn't PureNudism advertising pictures as "Real, Uncut and Uncensored"? Then why the f#ck are they "censoring" children's "holes for making poo-poo" when they're not sexual organs?

To add more laughter to this censorship hypocrisy, they have one gallery, Romanian Beach Voyeur (, that does not censor an adult woman's anus at all (the woman being "voyeured" by the cameraman, I guess!) And yes, voyeuring is considered a sexual behavior in most states, so why the f#ck do they keep saying "never any adult or sexual material"? If her anus was not censored, then why are all those poor innocent kids having their "holes for making poo-poo" censored in their pictures when what they are doing is hardly of a sexual nature? (Even pedobears have 0rgasmic pleasures with non-nude pictures of children, f#ck all those stupid pedobears.)

This is PureNudism admin Mark Anderson's vague reply to my inquiry:

They are enjoying themselves in the sun. And yes we will portray a naturist lifestyle. Certain poses do not portray a naturist lifestyle. We will omit them.

Isn't "playing with sand on four legs" a naturist lifestyle? Or are now kids required to fully "close their bums shut" while playing? Is voyeurism a "naturist lifestyle", which is what they intend to claim with that vague, ridiculous reply above? Are thus peeping toms normal naturists? COME ON YOU BUGGERS! F#ck PureNudism! Peeping toms are pedobears; children playing on sand while lying on four legs are just assuming natural poses to do non-sexual stuff.

In contrast, Candid-HD ( sells a Blu-ray disc titled "Family Nudist Fun 1" that doesn't resort to such ridiculous censorship of the "little hole for making poo-poo" (during the body-paint scene, a little girl squats on the sand to clean a paintbrush on a bucket of water, then turns around to re-position herself to better access the bucket, and accidentally exposes her "hole for making poo-poo" to the camera - nothing sexual at all). Also in contrast, the children's potty-training book/VHS/DVD series "Once Upon a Potty" never censors the "little hole for making poo-poo" (yes, if you guessed correctly, that phrase I constantly repeated under "quotes" actually comes from that potty-training series, and hereby I give full credit to the author Alona Frankel). And even the Japanese animated movie "Barefoot Gen", which portrays the survival story of a boy when US planes drop a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima, doesn't censor the "hole for making poo-poo".

So, in summary, PureNudism doesn't live up to its ideals and claims about "Real, Uncut and Uncensored" and "never any adult or sexual material". PureNudism (and Mark Anderson) are pure censorship hypocrites. F#ck 'em all along with all pedobears!

By Tobiotezuka on 24 January 2009 · 15:04

Sam Erican

Re: Young nude girls

Your site kicks ass. I was looking for "random naked girl" just to see what was around. Your site is way more interesting than just a random naked girl!

By Sam Erican on 28 July 2007 · 19:45



nice site!¡!

By wow on 31 August 2007 · 13:36




By maged on 4 October 2008 · 08:36


funny site

This site is awesome, Wow I have to show it to everyone, :) I wonder if it is bad that there is thousands of views shown and only three other comments? Good luck with all of this, I may be a fan of porn but there is a limit.

By Josh on 1 September 2007 · 01:29

A is A

Re: funny site

Thanks. There have been, I think, well over a million views of just this page at this point. The comments part of the site is a pretty recent addition though. I’ve got a bit of email for it in the past. I can think of several reasons someone wouldn’t want to comment on this one in particular including that anonymous comments don’t post.

By A is A on 1 September 2007 · 09:19


Re: Young nude girls

The follow-up post is indispensable for an understanding and putting context to this one. The exploitation of children and the exploitation of moral panic are symbiotic -- two sides of the same coin and often enough the same people.

One way of interpreting the results would be pointing an accusing finger at the Leviticans' agenda of enforced ignorance and infantilization of the American public. They are also, by far, the worst offenders.

By Vagrant on 2 September 2007 · 11:56

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

You could not be more right if I had written that for you. :)

Thou shalt not think any male over the age of 30 that plays with a child that is not their own is a pedophile. Some people are just nice. Thou shalt always kill

See also.

By A is A on 2 September 2007 · 12:37

do not over generalise

Re: Young nude girls

Please do not see my arguments as in favour of what you are against. But you should put more reason into your arguments and attitude. People in first world countries live in societies mostly situated within huge developed and nice urban areas. These educated people has societies that were transformed by a mass media linked life style that generalised facts and phenomena on a huge scale - actually distorting human emotional instinct formed over a 100 000 years still being observed in societies living in the rain forest. These modern societies have judicial systems that generalise aspects of social pathology to include a wide range of actions regarded as undesirable for a range of reasons. This situation then distort situations that must actually be regarded as natural. In my country there is a huge problem of teenage girls getting themselves pregnant to escape pressures of school etc. and to qualify for a goverment allowance. When people discuss this sitaution they talk about the girls of 15 becoming pregnant as an unatural phenomena. It is not. It is the most natural thing in te world for a 15 year old female to become pregnant. It is only in the last 100 years or so that for the majority of our people a beginning was made to see the social and economic and personal advantages of delaying marriage and pregnancy, etc. Your statistics actually reflect a natural phenomena - call it what you like -bad, or perversion etc.but it is still natural and 2000 years ago all girls between 12 - 14 years engaged in marraige, sex, etc. Girls living in basic societies within the rain forst still become pregnant shortly after 12 years of age, etc. In modern societies the sexualisation of children is tragic, but your statistics regarding the 12- 14 year olds look pretty natural to me for male beings whose very first sexual focus in their lives were on females of this age group over a time span of 100 000 years. These are not pedophiles and to include pedophiles within this male interest into young females will weaken actions agains real pedophiles which are a real danger to societies everywhere. The emotional interest into virgins (traditionally of this age group an not the nowadays concept) - has most probably more to do about genes - is still relavant - only now boys and girls of 12 years of age are not suppose to engage in sex - which is a good thing of course for modern societies. But to actually get some truth in your viewpoints you must start calling it something else, or focus on reality. You cannot generalise this much and hope to make a dent in the phenomena. Add to your arguments and focus on the actual children. You cannot put a 5 year old and 11 year old in the same category and hope to influence a world wide society.

The Statistics - Nude girls by age- for 12 - 14 year olds are actually natural and correct - if unwanted.

By do not over generalise on 7 September 2007 · 02:57


Re: Young nude girls

DNOG, I suspect that your comment is a drive-by and that you didn't take the time the read the follow up post -- which is linked for convenience at the end of this one and is explicitly recommended for further understanding. If you had, you mightn't be so quick to tell Ashley to use more reason.

By Vagrant on 7 September 2007 · 13:28

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

The Statistics - Nude girls by age- for 12 - 14 year olds are actually natural and correct - if unwanted.

As Scruggs noted—I am really not making an argument, just a little name calling, really—the real arguments were presented in the follow-up.

Some things I will mention about your points: while it was natural for 13-16 year-olds to be become pregnant in days gone by, it was also natural for them to wed; often an older man who could at least provide for them somewhat. It’s not now. Instead tax money provides for them and their lives are all but over since few have what it takes to be a single mom while finishing high-school and doing anything at all in life. It was also natural, and still is in many places, to kill or disown the baby or the girl.

From a naturalist argument, which you’re using, we must assume the disgusting position of “old enough to bleed, old enough to breed.” Higher fat diets have pushed menses back from 16 for some girls to the 6-8 range. While at the same time, progress has pushed mental maturity backwards too. Many 10 year-olds could run a homestead in the farming/framing era. Most 10 year-olds now are utterly incompetent at every skill necessary to survive outside modern human society. Bad combination. Kids who are less equipped for everything but physically ready much earlier.

So, again, referring to the follow-up, I agree it is natural, normal and for some age groups, probably completely healthy. I also know you can’t make generalizations and some 16 year-old women are more able to handle sexuality than some 25 year-old girls. I’ll sum up with–

really young nude

You: “I’m looking for really young nudes.”

Me: “Right on. Right on. So like 3..? 4…?”

You: “Oh! That’s just sick!”

Me: “Oh, excuse me. I do apologize.”

You: “I mean, Jesus! What do you think I am?”

Me: “Really, I am sorry.”

You: “I hope so.”

Me: “So, what did you have in mind?”

You: “Well, you know… …8 or 9.”

By A is A on 8 September 2007 · 12:10


Re^3: Young nude girls

i am looking 4 a wed page whith pice and vidoes
of little girls age from 5 to10 get back as fast as pos

By jordon on 7 September 2009 · 03:40

Susan Hampton

Re^2: Young nude girls

I came here searching for illegal nude pics of my daughter. We are trying to find out where they came from. I'm new to this, any help would be great

By Susan Hampton on 11 December 2008 · 21:01


Re^2: Young nude girls

yes send 2 me maet

By jordon on 7 September 2009 · 03:46

Stephen Bird

Re: Young nude girls

I find this funny, how can guys actually really want to look at little kids. I am married and that is all I need. I mean come on, if you are that desperate to go searching for little kids online, than you have got to be one sick minded pathetic person.... right?

By Stephen Bird on 15 September 2007 · 21:56


Re^2: Young nude girls

Small comment for you Steven Bird. If you are married and have kids, and disgusted by pedophiles, then how did you end up at this site?

By Doughboy on 22 October 2007 · 18:04


Re^2: Young nude girls

I'm inclined to agree. Doing brief research on this topic (to add to my essay on Sexual Harassment & stalking) I find it interesting the number of people who view websites and the limited responses. This is the first website that pops up on for "under aged girls" which is a good thing. It allows weak minded pedophilers to see what wrong they're creating.

Keep up the good work on the website and hopefully it keeps collecting as many people as possible to show them the errors of their ways.

By Justin702 on 2 October 2009 · 21:15


Re: Young nude girls

woah this site is intresting i waa looking for random nude girls and this came up and damn i love this site!!

By bugdann on 15 October 2007 · 21:07


Re: Young nude girls

This site truly is quite interesting. I am currently volunteering for a branch of the CPA (Child Protection Agency) that deals with online exploitation of children. You can always tell the true pedophiles...they make their way here(or similar "bunk" red flagging sites) and realize that their IP has been tagged by the webserver, they then write some story of how they arrived (i.e. searching for random nude). We all know that this is a lie. They just want to cover up for their mistake. My message goes out to all the pedophiles. WE ARE WATCHING! You may think you are getting away with what you watch on the internet. The truth is, once you goto a "red flag" site your IP is stored. The lists of potential pedophiles is gigantic none the less. That is more than likely why you have not been prosecuted yet. Believe me, you are on the list. It is only a matter of time before the law will catch up to you. My advice...stop looking at porn all together. The human mind has what is called an arousal pallette. When you watch porn on the internet your pallette expands. Soon you need more and more exotic porn to arouse you. This is a very dangerous thing to mess with. For all those real pedophiles out there you should check this site out (Before it is too late!)

By Doughboy on 22 October 2007 · 17:47

Mr Happy

Re^2: Young nude girls

Hi this is for Mr. CPC up there, i as you said I didnt get here by any mistake,I'm 22 years old and I was looking for 15 or 16 year old girls, not that i like young girls just the young body type, a 30 or 40year old woman with a teeny body type and a young looking face would be just as good , but thats beside the point i came here to tell you that anyone who knows anything about computers knows that you sound just like a jackass because IP#s can be changed and very easily at that, and although most dumbasses aren't smart enough to do it and I'm certainly not going to break it down for them so it may result in some arrests, that is not by far the best way to catch people in the act, What you need to do (and if your really CPC and you really work to save children I'm sure you can get clearance for this because the police do it all the time) is to hire a professional hacker, and once you capture the IP# go into that persons computer and find out what they have downloaded and saved on there hard drive, then no investigation would be necessary, if they had illegal shit rush there house and bust there ass if not then save the IP sense there probably old guys who aren't smart enough to change it and check back later,.....

I'm just saying that IP tracking is good and all but if your gonna fight child pornography at least do all you can to prevent it and not just some pussy browser tracking shit

By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:11


Re: Young nude girls

Say what? Doughboy dude, you're mostly incoherent, what little of your "theory" can be understood is junk psychology, your attack on Steve is bizarre and you're spamming for a commercial site. Moreover, a claimed affiliation with Child Protective Services gives no authority at all to your comments. Those agencies are among the very worst abusers of children. They attract disturbed people.

By Vagrant on 22 October 2007 · 21:11


Re: Young nude girls

those statistics about what age people search for is crap. Your average person simply looking for porn is not going to specify "18 year old girls", he doesnt need to, most porn feature girls of legal age, meanwhile the perverts that are looking for younger girls have to specify... THe only reason the number is highest at 13 is because no one is looking for 17, or even 16 year old girls because they simply look like many 18 y.o.s and visa versa, meanwhile 15 and 14, things get different, and 13 is where it becomes completely perverted. im not saying that it isnt wrong, but as a statistics student, I can tell you that the whole thing is crap.

By tsmith on 16 November 2007 · 16:35

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

Well, I believe you. You sound like a statistics student: you don’t know how to read or spell. Speaking as someone who long since finished school a good student in every subject, you’re just upset b/c you got stung. Read the follow up—Viewer mail: underage pornography—if you want the real treatment. Read a lot more literature if you want to better understand what you read going forward in life.

Here is a selection of current queries, just ’cause we’re on the topic–

  • pedo girls nude
  • preteen nude
  • young 7 year old nude girls
  • nude 10 yr girl pic
  • my mother likes to fuck me
  • 12 age girl sex with girl fucking
  • 11 year old girl naked show pitures of them
  • Turkey little young girl porno photo 12 yo
  • sick nude naked little girl picture galleries

And since those are current, right now, for visitors who were just on this page… ah, well, you know the punchline already, right?

By A is A on 16 November 2007 · 18:35

anthony rago

Re^3: Young nude girls

I agree with you that child porn is evil. I am a dad of an 8 yr old. I started to do some research on this and think I can write a book about this. I used to write and haven't in some while. If I could get it published - it could educate people as to what is on the internet. Since you have done so much research on this - maybe you can provide stats for me. I started with searching the web for over 18 yrs old sites. Of course all this stuff is legal but they use models that suggest underage kids. It's disgusting. Then I searched for stuff that was underage but non-nude. I know I can't go into the really dirty stuff - and I wouldn't want to because it would literally make me sick. But how can I learn what is on these sites without going there? Is there a forum like yours? Appreciate all help you can give and any advice.

By anthony rago on 6 January 2008 · 22:04


Re: Young nude girls

My original comment expired since I didn't find the time to respond to e-mail. basically the comment was you are a weird MF if you think any CP freak would worry about your site. By my next comment still stands.Yes even I sometimes find myself attempting to converse with a buffoon. Not unlike those who talk to their pets all the while knowing that said pet is an animal and does not have the capacity to understand human language. According to your theory, while the viewing of a rose might be acceptable as long you and your ilk are given the power of censorship the viewing of a rose bud should be a criminal offense. Also according to garden variety idiots such as yourself, since the viewing of the rose bud makes you want to fondle yourself that it must affect all others the same way. If that not be the case then the highly objectionable truth must be faced, which is that your witch hunt for the pervert you seek was over when you first placed your hands to the keyboard. "Non doth proclaim innocence so loudly as the guilty." The twisted mind does exist. More so in cyber space? No the twist was there before the connection was made. No doubt some will accept your fabricated statistical data as truth. I am sure it does have a certain amount of value since it is based on your own search results. All it tells me for sure is that you are seeking the company of those such as yourself that have a propensity for 13 year olds. "Seek and you shall find" . If you get lost in your wanderings the following info may help you find your way back.
Domain name: SEDITION.COM
Registrant Contact:
Ashley Pond V
Ashley Pond (
PO Box 2070
El Prado, NM 87529
That explains much. El Prado NM outside of Taos the community originally built by the old Hippies now supported by Drug and Alcohol Rehab Clinics.
IP Address
OrgName: New Dream Network, LLC
Address: 417 Associated Rd
Address: PMB #257
City: Brea
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 92821
Country: US

NetRange: -
NetHandle: NET-208-97-128-0-1
Parent: NET-208-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation

OrgAbuseHandle: DAT5-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: DreamHost Abuse Team
OrgAbusePhone: +1-714-706-4182

OrgNOCHandle: ZD69-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Network Operations
OrgNOCPhone: +1-714-706-4182

OrgTechHandle: ZD69-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Operations
OrgTechPhone: +1-714-706-4182

OrgTechHandle: MNA47-ARIN
OrgTechName: Nagel, Mark
OrgTechPhone: +1-949-279-5817

By Ric on 18 November 2007 · 07:50

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

You’re right… I’m so embarrassed. I can only hope that someday I’ll be as good at all this as you are.

Why, I think I’m crying a little. To imagine that someone with your insight and deep reading comprehension could see so clearly to the root of my soul through a single piece of satire. It’s almost as if you intuited the entire follow-up.

Such valuable feedback… I’m doubly embarrassed that I haven’t paid for it. Surely you’re a famous psychiatrist in real life. I must owe you a couple hundred dollars at least.

I must take issue with the Taos remark however. It was a Spanish town 300 years before the sixties and a Tiwa town for 500 years previous to that neighborhood extension. Some few Anglos did make the scene before the advent of free love as well.

And I hate to mention it but since we’re friends now, I guess I should. I really appreciate you taking the time to write again after you came down off your high. Your spelling, grammar, and ability to click a link in an email confirmation improved drastically from your first attempt.

You are slightly amusing. But definatly one strange muther fucka.Do you actually think 4 a min that a CP freak would worry about your site. I don't do CP but obiviously u are loking 4 those that do. If I gave damn whether u seen my IP address or not then you u wouldn't see period. U also do not appear 2 be 2 high up an the IQ scale. Happy hunting.

Thanks also for letting me know that they are referred to as “CP freaks.” I’ve learned so much today.

By A is A on 18 November 2007 · 10:54

Mr Happy

Re^3: Young nude girls

LOL not to be funny here man , but while you were ragging on homeboys spelling check out this line from you own feedback

"I don't do CP but obiviously u are loking 4 those that do."

notice anything wrong??? I was LOKING for that too but i never found

By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:27


Re: Young nude girls

Dr. Pond! I see you've managed to locate my patient. The pleismograph results and the burdillo tend to upset them, poor things. But they never go very far. I suspect they know that the treatment is ultimately the ideal resolution for what ails them.

By Vagrant on 19 November 2007 · 15:21


Re: Young nude girls

This is a condescending piece of worthless crap --- My entry was aimed precisely at locating countries where young girl pornography occurs. Your listing is deceptive in that EVERY household in the United States has a computer and internet access. The other countries you list clearly do not! Like the shitty media, your information is slanted from the outset. Please make a chart indicating the names of the COUNTRIES THAT CONDONE CHILD PORNO as an industry, and there you have an interesting statistic. I dont fear Americans - I am an American - I fear data smearing, tainted crap head media types who think America is bad and HIllary Clinton is great!! A photo of Hillary? Now thats pornographic based on the malfeasance she has never resolved beyond a shadow of doubt! Back to your condescending webpage; The Attitude that an image of freshly bathed new born child being towel dried in the loving arms of his or her mother is considered pornographic or sick -- THAT ATTITUDE IS TRULY PORNOGRAPHIC (sic) and generally, it is an American point of view. If you fear Americans as you say you do under your masthead then leave! Go to France or Mexico and take few illegals with you while you are at it!

By joejoe on 14 December 2007 · 12:11

A is A

Joey Joe-Joe Junior Shabadoo

Though it’s listed quite clearly—and the lack of statistical soundness is even mentioned above—here you go again: Viewer mail: underage pornography.

At your age being stupid is a choice, not a product of your environment and upbringing. The quote was a song lyric, randomly chosen. The picture was a political ad, randomly served by Google. The various other errors in context and fact are left as an exercise for the reader. Maybe take the day to look down the rails of your life to the vanishing point at the horizon. You still have time to head that shit off, man.

Also, Thailand, Italy, and Korea.

By A is A on 14 December 2007 · 12:25


Re: Young nude girls

Bravo!!!! Well played!!!! This thread is rather interesting. I think I'll have to follow up on it and see where it goes.

By Andrew on 20 January 2008 · 05:34


Re: Young nude girls

Do you have the power and the means to shutdown sites that have child porn?

If so I would like to help.

I have a daughter that is 13 and the thought that anyone would look at her in the wrong way really angers me.

A friend of mine told me about this site. So I read what you said about not being able to find any sites online. I searched and it did take about 2 hours but once I found one they started popping up everywhere.

If I sent you the addresses can you shut them down or know someone who can?

By Apaleador on 20 January 2008 · 21:45

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

I don’t have any personal power to shut down sites. The good news is, if you find a site that has actual underage pornography on it, all you have to do is write their host company, registrar, and tell the local cops; if they won’t listen, some of the stuff falls in the purview of the FBI; call them.

The problem is defining child porn. I was looking through this site’s ranks on a site tracker last week and it showed “related sites.” I clicked through a couple and found little girls (5-10 year-olds) in provocative poses and skimpy clothing. That’s not porn technically so it would be hard to shut it down but it’s obviously published for sexual gratification. Nauseating. I don’t personally blame the publishers as much as the parents. What kind of person let’s their kid do that? Even the ostensibly legal stuff?

But 13… By historical and biological standards that’s a woman. The age of consent in a couple of states was that or lower when I was that age. I don’t know if that’s still true. For your daughter, focus on support and education. The world is gonna see what it sees; in all its f’ed up glory. She’s the one who is going have to decide what it means and have the skills and strength to make it stick.

By A is A on 21 January 2008 · 20:09


Re: Young nude girls

I found a website called ACPO (Anti-child Porn Organization). You can report the URL of the site there and they investigate it and notify the proper authorities to deal with it.

Hopefully, this will help close them down. I was able to report 20 sites, but a lot of them were interconnected with each other. The sites didn't send you to any galleries, just other sites with thumbnails.

If you click on a thumbnail it sent you to another site with thumbnails. Even though there weren't any galleries the thumbnails were bad enough and need to be deleted from the web.

By Apaleador on 25 January 2008 · 16:53


Re: Young nude girls

Ok.. Well, I have to admit that most of this is very true in many ways and that some people that hit your site will try to say something else, try this one on.. I was (and I mean that in all ways) convicted of downloading CP many years ago and did time for it. I am not saying that because I am proud, I am saying it because it is true and that it can happen no matter what someone tries to do to hide it. The reason I came to this site was not while searching for porn however. A friend gave me the address for it because he found it while searching for porn (i did however slap him across the back of the head for it) I wanted to check it out due to what i went to prison for and find that you did your homework and that the intelligent people are making valid posts and points and the idiots (for lack of a better word) are just that due to they cant seem to grasp what you and your site are doing in the information field. I say Kudos to you and to the rest of the people in here actually giving good responses and from someone who has been there, I am glad for it. I have 2 little boys of my own now and trust me, its not something you would like to see happen to your own (unless you are one of the ones that does that in the first place.. and you know who you are)

By Grantomas on 26 February 2008 · 23:03



Thanks. This site is very useful - I was searching information about child porn (and pedophiles) for school project (Project about dangers and traps on the internet for young, unmature people...).

But this numbers are just...terrifying...However i think, that lots of those searches are from "horny" 13 year old boys - in that age, whebn puberty starts, they ussually starts to "look" on girls...

(Sorry for not-good english, I am writing a bit faster than i would like to.)

By dracek on 5 April 2008 · 01:25


Re: Young nude girls

sexy young virgin hot girl

By lakitha on 9 April 2008 · 01:03

Dave R

Re: Young nude girls

Very interesting subject indeed. After reading some of the posts here, I have come to my own conclusion. It's human to be devious. You can argue with me, but prove me wrong, you will not. Though this website seems to want to help many sick people or help the ignorant become aware of a terrible subject... the truth is simple. You have nothing better to do. It's a dog eat dog world. Everyone has a sin/flaw. I'm sure you knew/know that. Don't contradict me, we both know I'm right.

By Dave R on 12 April 2008 · 13:25

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

What’s this “we,” white man?

Stick to stuff at your comprehension level and it will all seem less devious.

By A is A on 13 April 2008 · 10:52


Re: Young nude girls

how are sites like pure nudism legal..saw a comment above and checked it out...its ridiculous how they can try to offer memberships for a site that has ridiculously illegal crap on there...

By jay984 on 28 April 2008 · 23:42

Why give a name

Re: Young nude girls

Well isn't this a long thread. It is interesting to see how many people get defensive over such a simple bit of information which admittedly is flawed but has a very valid core. Still, as I'm probably about to say some very offensive things myself, let us clear the air. I ended up here by searching for information on the legality of nudists posting pictures of their underage children. Which reminds me, I'll be checking back at this site for responses, and I'm still rather curious about that topic. I believe that a person could not get into trouble with it due to the fact that it is not sexual in nature. I also believe that people will and do misuse this in order for sexual gratification. Oh yes, and for those of you wishing to pass yourselves off as officers of Child Protective Services: A) CPS is one of the most mislead and disgusting organizations on the planet. They are answerable only to themselves in any reasonable manner, and should have been disbanded years ago in favor of more logical and controlled systems. B) IF you actually ARE an officer of CPS, then one must wonder how it is that you yourself came to this site. C) Since the odds are extremely against you being a CPS officer: The act of impersonating a federal or state authority is a crime. In every state of the fucked up nation called the United States of America you can be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for that act. I sincerely hope you're from the United States, by the way, because lately I need a good laugh. Now then, on to topics more relevant to the commentary in this thread. First of all, to you panicking paedophiles who have ended up here. You're sick. But calm down. There are thousands of ways to end up on a particular site (This one for example) and the majority of them are legal. Seek help though. Seriously. To those of you who are legitimately ranting and raving at the people stating that 13 is a natural age to breed: Calm down. First of all, it's a valid viewpoint if you look at the evolution of the human species. We were designed to go sexually active near that age. Now mind you, I say this despite the fact that I have a daughter, and a little girl whom I consider my sister (My mother's best friends daughter) and I will personally and cheerfully kill anyone who thought of molesting either of them. So why do I say that it is a valid viewpoint? Because we are hardwired that way. It is a disgusting fact of evolution that the mammalian brain is geared to want to jump any valid member of the opposite sex as soon as they are entering sexual maturity. However in todays day and age, I fervently wish that our unique propensity for logic would override this, however that is not the case in some individuals.

To those of you supporting the viewpoint that it is a normal situation to want to view and/or mate with individuals of the above mentioned age groups: Also consider that despite our instincts, and despite our occasional lack of knowledge, we have managed to overcome most of our basic instincts through ordered logic and the enforcement of the law. Also to be considered is that is the fact that with maturity should come the innate ability to override our base desires in favor of self preservation. As a George Carlin once stated "Survival comes before fucking". Paedophilia is not a great way to survive as a good number of paedophiles die either before making it to prison, or during their sentence. Usually by the hands of other individuals whom are unable to overcome their base instincts. Now for the site author. I disagree with very little of the content of your site, despite the fact that you have not done proper research on the topic that you have chosen to lambast visitors about. However, the main item with which I take issue is the statement, 'What's this "we," white man?". This statement provoked me to bother commenting for three reasons: 1) Why would you post a blatantly racist, and clearly ignorant comment on your page while attempting to enlighten the masses regarding an issue that you clearly care about? 2) Assuming that you are of non-Caucasian origins, another possible explanation is that you believe that the 'white man' owes you something due to past transgressions. Let me say this clearly: I have never owned a slave. I have never 'stolen' land (By the way, a poor business deal does not necessarily mean theft), and I have never put any person in a containment camp. Spew your bile elsewhere if this is the case, because most of us are tired of it. Racism is ignorance, plain and simple and regardless of where it is directed. 3) I will assume here that your comment was/is directed at Dave R, since it directly follows it. With that assumption in mind, I would like to point out that he did not identify himself as being of Caucasian decent. He also made a valid point that humans have flaws. That is an immutable fact. Despite my opinion on his post I must concede that point. You however, instead of taking an approach such as pointing out that humans can control and overcome their flaws through discipline and understanding, chose to exhibit your own flaw by spewing racism in his general direction. Given your choice of phrasing, I assume that you are what people like to call 'Native American'? Well, I was born here, so that makes me about as native as anyone else born here, despite my Irish ancestry. With that out of the way, Dave R, yes it is human to be devious, however; the clear fact of the matter is that it is also human to strive for constant improvement of ourselves. It is also human to desire to protect those who cannot or will not protect themselves from those who believe 'It's a dog eat dog world.', and who believe that sentiment gives them the right to abuse, deride, and otherwise demean another human being. Being an American I firmly believe in our basic human rights, such as freedom of speech. If Ms. Pond wishes to spend her time designing, building, and maintaining a trap site, then who are you to speak ill of her? What have you spent your time doing? Insulting someone who you think has 'nothing better to do'. IF that is the case, then tell me, why would you wish to demean this endeavour? Why would you wish to deride her for the pastime she has chosen for herself? And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? - Matthew 7:3 Forgive the bible reference. I'm not Christian, but it seemed to be the most fitting rebuke.

By Why give a name on 10 May 2008 · 14:07

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

I can appreciate the sentiments but that’s actually the punchline to a joke—not some sort of mini-racist diatribe—in response to this–

Don't contradict me, we both know I'm right.

I’m actually so white that I don’t consider the Irish to be. Too many Celts in the woodpile.

Now, that’s called satire, irony, sarcasm, facetiousness, and so on in some circles. I concede it is not always readily identifiable in snippets. You see the problem though. It’s funny if you get it. It’s not funny if you explain it. If I’d stopped with that line, this comment would have been amusing. Now, it’s not. Of course there are fewer misunderstandings when one bothers to read the materials presented and referenced repeatedly: Viewer mail: underage pornography.

So… given the choice between amusing readers who have both a sense of humor and the means to apply it or angering some who don’t read deeply or widely or perhaps are generally unhappy and can see only more unhappiness in any potentially ambiguous situation or text, I’ll take Manhattan. Got change for a $50?


If Ms. Pond wishes to spend her time designing, building, and maintaining a trap site…

This is one article out of approximately 5,000 pages on Sedition·com and Ms Pond also works on and contributes to other sites. She is the hardest working woman on the Internet and I’m sure she’d resent the implication that this bit of fluff and log parsing constituted more than an hour of her time in the ten years this site has been in operation.

By A is A on 10 May 2008 · 15:13


Re: Young nude girls


By on 14 June 2008 · 00:55

13 years

Re: Young nude girls

Dude I came here cause I'm a perverted 13 yr boy looking for 13 yr old porn and I know I'll find it somewhere on the interenet.

By 13 years on 19 July 2008 · 23:39

Mr Happy

Re^2: Young nude girls

what a load of BS, i know for a fact from my own experience that any 13 year old boy who happened to stumble upon this site would not only be scared shitless that there mommy would find out they were searching for porn, they would most likely be too intimidated by the long process of leaving a comment and the fear of being tracked down by the cops to even thing about accually going through with leaving the comment.

This is the kind of asshole who needs to be hacked to find out just whats on his hard drive,
because we all know a 13 year old boy would run away from this site in a heartbeat as soon as knew there was a chance of being in trouble

By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:39

smart with no common sense

Re^3: Young nude girls

That's so not true. I've been reading this site for about 45 minutes now. It did frek me out a little, but i'm not gonna get scared and run away. Anyway, all the things you people have said is true in some way or another, but you don't have to pin everything you think is wrong on one another. Just remember that we're all different, we all have flaws, and we all face consiquences. Let's just leave it at that>

By smart with no common sense on 24 January 2009 · 17:03


Re: Young nude girls

I found this site after finding I did a search for that URL and the word "illegal" and popped up here since one of the comments had also mentioned the name of that website.

The statistics are pretty interesting.

But I am wondering.. I don't know if I reported purenudism before, but I know I reported a similar website that had a few pictures that were also on the purenudism site. How can it be legal for that website to not only have those pictures, but to SELL DVD videos of their teen junior beauty contests? The website says it includes nudes at all ages, but it also said it is legal. How does that work?

And for the person that commented way below me about only pedophiles finding this type of stuff.. I found the website that I found by doing a google search for NUDISTS.. Not everyone that stumbles upon that crap (or this website, for that matter) is here for disgusting purposes.

By Karla on 22 July 2008 · 08:29

Mr Happy

Re^2: Young nude girls

Hi, to the person just above wondering about the legality of,.. I am 22 years old, however do to my stupid adolescent years and talking shit to a girl that worked for the local gas station when i was 14, I was forced to take a class for sexual predators when i was 16 years old, and because of it I know most of the laws for this sort of thing

I mentioned this a little way up the list as well to reply to someone else who was confused,

Heres the thing = is legal because of one reason, and that reason is that the people in the pics and videos aren't doing anything sexual, They are simply carrying on there normal lives and so are there children, and since they are on a nudist ranch the pics and video are considered in the laws eyes to be no different then any other family pictures or home video that you or I might have

and I also mentioned before that it's almost a waste to report these sites because of the fact that they are on a nudist camp and the children are doing normal kid stuff, this gives them the excuse that they are simply proud parents sharing family pics and home movies, so that even if it was illegal it would be a violation of there rights to prosecute them

hope this helps you out,

and in case your wondering about the incident when i was 14 and how i came about having to take a sexual predators class,

I am ashamed but not afraid to say what it was, My friends and I would hang out alot of times at the gas station, no one cared and we were even friends with some of the employs and would chill with them when they went on break, until this new girl (who by the way was 20 years old) started working there, she made a huge fuss about us hanging out there and came out to get in our faces, as she was screaming in our faces cursing us out, I cut her off and said, and I quote "you need to go back in before i rape your ass" , She reported me to the cops for threatening to rape her and long story short I spent a year in a group home and when i got out I had to take the class for sexual predators as a punishment

So if you were trying to pass judgement please know that i never had and never will have any thoughts about young children, the offense i was in trouble for was against a girl who was more than 5 years older than me, and i had no in intention of going through with it, it was simply a strikeback because she was cursing and yelling in our faces

By Mr Happy on 25 August 2008 · 22:51


Re: Young nude girls

this site is awesome. 2 thumbs up.

By y8ycgl on 4 October 2008 · 01:13


Re: Young nude girls

I want to see photo of young nude girls. Especially their nipples and vagina. I f you do not hesitate, send me photos.

By oceancruizer on 17 October 2008 · 03:18


Re^2: oceancruizer

No, you don't. Stop lying. You want to see pictures of pumpkins and then you want to gloat about taxing them.

"We made the change because we wanted the sales tax law to match what we thought the predominant use was," Mulvey said. "We thought the predominant use was for decorations or jack-o'-lanterns." Previously, pumpkins had been considered an edible squash and exempted from the tax. The department ruled this year that pumpkins are taxable -- with some exceptions -- if they are advertised for use as jack-'o-lanterns or decorations.

Are you immune to shame? Have you no sense of decency? Is there anything at all that you do not plan to tax?

By Vagrant on 18 October 2008 · 07:52

A is A

Re^2: oceancruizer


Speaking of stem cells, I did not know this fact until last week which was much later than the week 10 years ago I was engaged in typing out the treatise on dueling with the first of the two following: “Famous alumni included William Burroughs and Gore Vidal” (Los Alamos Ranch School).

–Vivian Sixtus

By A is A on 18 October 2008 · 10:30


Re^3: oceancruizer

There's an unseemly boasting quality to the Wikipedia entry -- the part about the property itself, where they describe the existing facilities. It's a lot like the crowing of thieves who have managed a good score, and are happily bragging about how clever they were to have chosen a provident victim. For justification they note that the surrounding land had previously been stolen. So it was only natural that they'd want to steal the school too.

There are times when I question the value system that goes into such things.

By Vagrant on 18 October 2008 · 13:45

Mr Happy

Re^4: oceancruizer

You guys speak in jibber jabber, not to mention this Ashley guy looking suspiciously like Jesus and creeping me out just a little

I wish we could just remake the justice system to make criminals take what they give ( with the exception of murder )

Murderers should be tortured 24/7 until they die from exhaustion

For every one else they should get an extreme version of the crime they committed done back to them

Example: a thief should have everything he owns ( down to his underwear ) stolen and then be forced by law to live on the street

A child rapest should be tied down and have a street light pole shoved up his ass

an arson should be burned alive

and so on and so forth,

Some people might disagree and say, ooooohhh it's cruel and unusual punishment.......but I guarantee that there would be alot less crime in the world if the laws weren't so light handed, and people were actually made to suffer what they inflict on others

You might call me a psycho for thinking like I do, but I don't really care, I don't go by Mr. Happy because I am normal I can assure you,..... and I can honestly give you my word that if anyone ever even thinks about my daughter the wrong way when she is still a child I will not only kill them, but torture them until they puke and then make them choke to death on their own severed nut sack

By Mr Happy on 29 October 2008 · 12:32

A is A

Re^5: oceancruizer

The problem is, was, and always will be: innocent persons are convicted of crimes every single day. Often just because they’re poor or the wrong color.

Advocating for torturing, execution, etc, and so on, and so forth knowing that some of those involved will be innocent makes one… well, it’s an exercise left for the reader to admit determine what it makes one.

By A is A on 29 October 2008 · 14:29

Mr Happy

Re^6: oceancruizer

Yes well be that as it may,
and don't take this the wrong way I completely agree with you

But those who are guilty should in my opinion (and I am sure I'm not the only one) be forced to suffer there crime 10 times worse than that of there victim

For example: (and I put myself in there shoes for this one)
If I held a woman down and raped her, then as a consequence was held down and forced to take something the size of a telephone pole up my ass....and I don't mean lube it up and put it in gently, I mean wet it, Dip it in sand and ram it in there.

I don't know about you but that would pretty much sway me towards not forcing myself on anymore women.

If you disagree please let me know, but as far as I can tell that method would more than work.....and whats more, people who aren't criminals would look at the rapest's broken down (and opened up) body and it would most likely be afraid to break the
law themselves

But then of course there family members would cry and claim oh.....he didn't mean to "accidentally" rape that woman, his wife was depriving him and he was desperate

and then instead of telling them tough shit, do the crime do the time...they would kiss his/her ass and let the perv off with a slap on the hand

Which by the way is why crime and all that is getting so bad, and if you don't agree with me you need to open your eyes and turn on the news

By Mr Happy on 2 November 2008 · 09:30

Mr Happy

Re^6: oceancruizer

And by the way,
as far as serial killers and things like that go

as I said before, If you kill someone just for the hell of it....

You should be tortured, Not only would you find out real quick if the person did it or not (because when your in that much pain things come out) they probably would not want to go through it again and therefore would be safe to release

and I'm not talking about some BS pulling hairs from your genitals or standing against the wall with your thumbs crap

I'm talking about sick and twisted maximum pain stuff

Like having the skin on your arm sliced all the way around and hooking it to a machine that peels the skin off by one inch every hour, and then have a clock telling them exactly when the machine will activate each time, if they don't crack they will not only have this done to every body part imaginable (and yes there too) they will probably suffer a death so bad I wouldn't even wish it on a rattlesnake, with not only the pain but severe infection, fever, ect.

Please reply if you do not think that would be a good enough reason for you to thing twice about killing someone

otherwise let me any other opinion you might have

By Mr Happy on 2 November 2008 · 09:42


Re^5: oceancruizer

With regard to the light pole thing. Is that with or without the light attached.

By ziggy on 14 April 2009 · 11:34


Re: Young nude girls

i really impressed after studying of this, forum, i like too much, and like to watch little age girls nude pictures

By sharjeel_malik25 on 29 October 2008 · 09:07


Re: Young nude girls

I just got done listening to a segment on NPR (ofcourse) "word of mouth" about Porning Of America an how younger and younger girls are being exploited. It spoke of how it wasn't even about sex anymore but more of a sensation. It is deeply disturbing as someone who dreams of having a baby girl in the feature. The questions of what will happen to my child and how can I protect her and is living in the US an option anymore? These questions trouble me everyday. I just dont understand whats wrong with our country and the sickening people who live here. Its truly depressing...

By Deed on 5 November 2008 · 10:06

fun boy

Re: Young nude girls

okay i meant to get to ages 18 -25 thats wat i googled nude girls 18-25 just legal age and this popped up I AM NOT A PERV just a admitted freak thank u

By fun boy on 2 December 2008 · 15:59

fun boy

Re: Young nude girls

im back all u guys googleing for girls under 17 are fuced up assholes

By fun boy on 2 December 2008 · 16:02


Re^2: Young nude girls

Dude, knock it off! I keep telling you: Belgium doesn't exist.

By Vagrant on 4 December 2008 · 14:24


Re: Young nude girls

Hey, good work mate, keep it up! I have to admit, as wrong as it may be i use tag lines like "young nude girls" and "naked 14yr old" on my wifes modelling sites because she gets so many more hits than she did when i was using things like "glamour model" or "sexy naked female". Makes you wonder what the world is coming to when people actually have to get off to naked children doesnt it?

By DaveC1980 on 10 December 2008 · 06:37


Re: Young nude girls

Just a warning.
Never trust family. My uncle tried to rape me when I was 13. He also tried to rape another cousin of mine as well incl my brother.
He turned out to be gay, but the damage was done...

By Francois on 16 December 2008 · 12:15

Richard Karl Watson

Re: Young nude girls

I really enjoyed your web site. It seems very informative.I myself, however, was looking for young girls aged 21 to 30. You see, when a man becomes a Grand Father (@ the ripe young age of 56), then young to that man becomes girls in their 20's and 30's. But now that I've found your site I will be loging on from time to time to read the interesting comments and maybe throw in a few of my own. I don't know how to go about it, but anyone can check out my profile, if they know how from my email address. You see I'm one of those old geezers who is fairly new at computers and am teaching myself, so my learning is very slow; something like my brain patterns.
Keep up the great site. Rick

By Richard Karl Watson on 15 January 2009 · 01:59


Re: Young nude girls

i am impressed with a lot of the posts on this site. but one really caught me. she was talking about how she wants to have a daughter some day and is afraid of what might happen to her.

well the problem is that a lot of those who look at child porn pics are the same ones who pass the leglistration. people who want a better world for there children will have to basicly fight the government because they are becoming way to corrupt.

i understand some mistakes concerning those 16/17 yrs of age because you can't always tell. the reason i say this is because in most states 15+ it is considered stactitory rape not really CP, though it is. (i mean those in pics and real life in this paragraph)

By KC on 28 January 2009 · 19:53


Re: Young nude girls

Very informative and interesting site. Was looking up because was told that it was a very good naturist site. While that is true, I still think they should be considered illegal due to the child pics on there. I understand that they are only doing what comes naturally, but they should make sites like that purchase/run a background check on some of the people that go there. That site has the potential to be a breeding ground for pedophiles. I am 27 years old. When I was 2-4 years old I was molested by a friend of the family off and on for those 2 years....a female friend. Back then that was almost unheard of, so the police didn't really do a whole lot about it. My family even tried to say I was lying about her. It's not always girls being molested and it's not always men that do it; although that's the case for 90% of pedophilia cases. I am going into the Navy in another month into the Advanced Computer Field. I also intend to go to school for studying human behavior(sexual) and what determines why pedophiles do what they do. Although I do not like pedophiles and I think they should all die slowly and painfully(sorry Mr Happy but they shouldn't be allowed to live even with the torture, although I do agree with most of what you said). Sorry kind of off track here but it just pisses me off to know that with the internet it's become even easier for a pedophile to get his/her rocks off. Also as anthony said even the "nonnude" sites are rough. I actually went to one of those and was sickened because most of the children in those sites are in even more erotic poses than a lot of "legal age" nude pictures and any parent that allowed their child to be photographed in that kind of pose should be found just as guilty and with the same punishment that any other pedophile is subject to.

By usn_aecf_TGibson on 17 February 2009 · 22:04


Re: Young nude girls

There is a very simple test to see if a nudism site is inappropriate and porno - ask the question: do they show as many old men as young girls? Purenudism does not! It is skewed to young girls - I do not believe that young girls have a higher than average interest in nudism. I think they are in violation of their own legal statement as they are not showing innocent nudist lifestyles. Clearly ... porn! Clearly ... should be reported. Clearly ... a legal loophole that should be shut by our legislators

By gabbal on 2 March 2009 · 05:48


Re: Young nude girls

Thank you, I was having a weak moment and found your website. I read through the articles and they got me back to were a need to be. Once again Thank you.

By wiley on 19 March 2009 · 15:00


Re: Young nude girls

Most interesting blog site.

By ziggy on 14 April 2009 · 11:44

the 16 yo

Re: Young nude girls

wow i spent an hour on this site
i am 16 years old
i am a shy guy and never had gf so i just wanted to see what 14 to17 look like
is that really that bad??

By the 16 yo on 27 May 2009 · 01:17

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

No, it’s not. Welcome to America.

By A is A on 27 May 2009 · 17:43


Re: Young nude girls

I'm 14 so thats fine lol

By Anon on 24 July 2009 · 09:09

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

You don’t know what you’re talking about. LOLita!

Girl, 15, Faces Child Porn Charges for Nude Cell Phone Pictures of Herself

By A is A on 24 July 2009 · 20:31


Re^3: Young nude girls

Wow... I\'ve seen some pretty f\'ed up articles about 14-16 year-olds being charged for posting nude pics of themselves on the web... But how the hell can someone get away with charging one for having pics of that nature ON HER-OWN CELL PHONE? It\'s her cellphone is it not? Technically it\'s the parent\'s since they were most likely paying for it, but in them giving it to her, they were giving her ownership of the cell making it rightfully hers. If this isn\'t the case the the parent\'s have full responsibilty for what happens on the cellphone (can someone sum-up what I just said, sometimes I get ignorant and rant on about this I don\'t fully understand due to lack of knowledge of our contries government). Yes I\'m only 14, and I believe that her being charged under those circumstances is just wrong (not because I\'m just about her age). And also, who cares if I\'m 14!? I just want to see a girl my age since I most likely won\'t until... Just forget it. I\'m attracted to girls my age.
I\'m not some loli-boy who likes milfs and old people getting it on (shivers). If I\'m wrong in what I think then let all other people who thought the same at my age and who will be thinking the same in the future be doomed to a life of being single for all an eternity! (Yeah a little dramatic, I know. But it\'s how I do.)

By Nameless on 23 September 2009 · 17:07


Re: Young nude girls

I Googled "Youngest Looking 18" and ended up Here! Damn. I didnt do it for "Research" purposes. I'm a Pervert! I like Young looking girls! Silicone tits and kipper lips dont do it for me!
I looked at some naturist sites after reading the comments here. Theyr not for me. They are full of naked children. I think they should be banned. And the parents should be Beaten up. Only Peados would subscribe to those sites!! No? Why would anyone want to look at Other Peoples Naked Children? Why would you want strangers to look at yours? So you can make a fortune from the subs? ahem, Sexploitation. I wonder How the children will feel when theyr older.
"You think ur parents are shit?" "Mine Put Pictures...Charged Peados..."

By Toot on 23 September 2009 · 08:33


Re: Young nude girls

It comes down to education. We teach our children about reading, writing, math, science, sports, art and hundreds of other topics. But SexEd... OH NO!! We must protect the children! These innocent little ones would never have a sexual thought if it weren't for SexEd. So you have 13 year old girls that don't have a clue how their own bodies work and with urban myths like 'you can't get pregnant your first time doing it' and 'if he pulls out you can't get pregnant'. No telling how many girls have produced offspring after hearing just those two... and there are dozens. I firmly believe that starting SexEd at around 10 would help the mental climate of this country. [England is much more fun because the Puritans left and came here]. Of course, SexEd should not only cover what the mechanics are, but should show pictures. Curiosity have gotten more kids in trouble than any number of cats. Show tits, pussies, cocks [yes, I know the medical terms, and they should be taught, but the kids will learn more using common terms] in all stages of arousal. Now we get into porn. OMG!! That SexEd book is pornographic! We should ban it. I weep.

By Roderic on 14 October 2009 · 13:37

A is A

Re^2: Young nude girls

As that is the only remotely lucid or intelligent thing anyone has said on the topic in awhile, you are the winner of The Last Commenter Standing.

By A is A on 14 October 2009 · 22:46