A clarification regarding my positions on Sarah Palin –or– Sexist… You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means –or– My favorite आर्य

Monday, 8 September 2008

This post—Change Hotness you can believe in—may have seemed an endorsement of Sarah Palin’s candidacy and the ticket upon which she scoots. As Christine Gregoire and Sheila Jackson-Lee can testify, however, just because I wouldn’t refuse a blow job from a candidate doesn’t mean I’d vote for her.1 Sidebar: “Less teeth” isn’t a euphemism or an idiom, Chris, but a plea for clemency.

Now for an elaboration of my positions on Sarah Palin–

What I’d do with Sarah and her hot young female kin. Aryan style!

Lord, I loves me some old fashioned Aryan loving.

Plus, anyone who votes for another politician who ends up ending a million more human beings out of bigotry and cowardice is a war criminal as far as I’m concerned. You don’t get another 9-11-by on that bullshit, my farmer-tanned neighbors. Do it again and you are the bad guy. We all know what patriotic Americans do with bad guys, right? The Tenth Amendment offers me a great deal of legal latitude in rectifying the situation should it prove itself ongoing.

1 My lawyer, Ten Lafford, informs me that this statement opens Sedition·com Incorporated to a sexual-orientation discrimination suit and insists I add: or him.

digg stumbleupon del.icio.us reddit Fark Technorati Faves