Duchamp was not an artist, also her pants were neither hot nor anti-malarial
Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Marcel Duchamp was not an artist. He was a multi-media art critic.






People should wear more hats.
Tuesday, 30 November 2010
Marcel Duchamp was not an artist. He was a multi-media art critic.
About · Referring queries · Random article · Random doc · Recent comments (XML) · Contact · XML/Atom
articles · document pages
Anyone can double click to edit the block below. Its content is not necessarily from Sedition·com or reviewed or approved by us. Your chalkboard entry will stay there until someone else does the same or the server cache is reset or expires in a week. Rules: you can use basic Markdown or XHTML strict, no styles, no scripts, no <pre/>, no attributes except href for links, 750-ish characters, and, as usual, threats and abuse won’t be tolerated unless they’re very, very funny.
Why would you want to do this? You can put an ad and link for your site there. You can put a “Sedition·sucks” there. It’s above the fold on the top page and it’s all yours until the next visitor comes along.
Why would we want to do this? 1) Free speech is fun. 2) Cross-pollination is fun. 3) A Web 2.0 résumé point is nice when poking the job market with a sharp stick.
» Your candidate, I presume? #2.1
» Your candidate, I presume? #2
» Austin, Texas is the new Austin, Texas
» George Foreman I is going down in the first
» I don’t win every fight in my dreams
» How on Earth are there only two results in Google for this?
» You know what occurs to me seeing Harvey Weinstein doing the perp walk?
» Dennis Perrin’s still got it –OR– #Oprah2020
» Those who do not leave a reason…
» Re: The deaths in Charlottesville, Virginia today
» Is there anything more insulting…
» How to run *old* perl Kwiki (like 0.38) on PSGI
» Convert image sources to data URI with Perl: img2data
» Flugblätter der Widerstandsbewegung in Deutschland.
» Flugblätter der Weissen Rose. IV
» Flugblätter der Weissen Rose. III
We use carbon neutral web hosting to serve pages and our software, images, and auxiliary content are developed using 100% wind power; no, seriously.
A store of honey had been found in a hollow tree, and the Wasps declared positively that it belonged to them. The Bees were just as sure that the treasure was theirs. The argument grew very pointed, and it looked as if the affair could not be settled without a battle, when at last, with much good sense, they agreed to let a judge decide the matter. So they brought the case before the Hornet, justice of the peace in that part of the woods.
When the Judge called the case, witnesses declared that they had seen certain winged creatures in the neighborhood of the hollow tree, who hummed loudly, and whose bodies were striped, yellow and black, like Bees.
Counsel for the Wasps immediately insisted that this description fitted his clients exactly.
Such evidence did not help Judge Hornet to any decision, so he adjourned court for six weeks to give him time to think it over. When the case came up again, both sides had a large number of witnesses. An Ant was first to take the stand, and was about to be cross-examined, when a wise old Bee addressed the Court.
“Your honor,” he said, “the case has now been pending for six weeks. If it is not decided soon, the honey will not be fit for anything. I move that the Bees and the Wasps be both instructed to build a honey comb. Then we shall soon see to whom the honey really belongs.”
The Wasps protested loudly. Wise Judge Hornet quickly understood why they did so: They knew they could not build a honey comb and fill it with honey.
“It is clear,” said the Judge, “who made the comb and who could not have made it. The honey belongs to the Bees.”
Take that, subspace.